I am sure that by now, everyone is familiar with the term
‘Friend Zone’. Unfortunately it does not refer to an awesome online forum where
you can meet like-minded people and become lifelong besties. Rather the phrase
is generally used in a derogatory manner to refer to the “dreaded” situation of
a woman wishing to have a platonic friendship with a man rather than a romantic
(ie. sexual) one, thus relegating him to the dreaded ‘Friend Zone’.
This phrase became widely used after it was introduced to
popular culture in 1994 by the TV show FRIENDS
– a show which I am a huge fan of, by the way, so don’t start accusing me of
being a hater! – when Joey refers to Ross as ‘Mayor of the Friend Zone’ after
listening to him drone on and on about his unrequited love for Rachel. What
began as a playful term, however, has developed into a symbol of what many
feminists (myself included) see as an emblem of misogyny and the assumption that
women have worth only as sexual partners.
My anger with the phrase first boiled over when I had a male
friend passive aggressively tell me that his New Year’s Resolution was to ‘not
be put in the Friend Zone anymore’, an obvious dig at myself as I had rebuffed
his advances several times after having been very upfront about the fact that I
had just left a super serious relationship and was not interested in romantic
attachments of any kind. Despite my insistence on a platonic relationship,
however, he still insisted on dropping this term as an insult to both my
gestures of continued friendship and my worth as a person, which led me to drop
him as a friend.
My reasoning for what you may think was a hasty de-friending:
why wouldn’t he want to be my friend?! I’m a cool person! I’m a good
conversationalist with (at least) average intelligence, many and varied
interests, and a great sense of humour! Plus I love having fun and trying new
things, and I am a super loyal and
supportive friend. My closest friends are all people who I have been through
thick and thin with and who I would do almost anything for. By not wanting to
pursue a friendly relationship with me, he was missing out in a big way! Plus I
was annoyed by his blatant disregard for all of the aforementioned qualities,
as well as by the fact that he completely reduced me to a physical object
because I have breasts. Exquisite breasts!
Obviously many relationships, platonic or otherwise, begin as
the result of establishing connections between visual elements and past feelings
– a form of implicit memory, for the psychology buffs out there. We feel an attraction
to people based on many factors – some unexplainable – and thus,
we want to get to know them better.
What I’m saying is, YES, it’s ok to be attracted to your
friends! It’s even alright to imagine that friendship blooming into something
more. Hell, it happens to everyone, and in personal experience, the best
relationship I’ve had in the past developed out of a close friendship. That
being said, it’s not alright to expect every single person to whom you feel a
physical attraction to reciprocate. A mutual attraction is not always shared,
and there is a reason unrequited love has been a common theme in music and literature
for centuries. However, there is also a reason that many of the happiest couples
out there were friends first: they respect each other, they understand each
other, and they enjoy being in each other’s company – factors which last far
longer than physical magnetism.
Speaking of physical magnetism, we seem to be stuck together... |
When the 'Zone' is this attactive, who wouldn't want to be in it? |
In conclusion, putting someone in the ‘Friend Zone’ is not a
bad thing! In fact, the ‘Friend Zone’ could be the first step towards a great
romantic connection or - even better - a new lifelong best friend! On the other hand, putting me in the ‘Girlfriend Zone’ without
my consent is a great way to ensure friendship – or any other type of
relationship – is never achieved.
CURRENTLY HUMMING: ‘Dorothy Dandridge Eyes’ by Janelle Monae
ft. Esperanza Spalding, a couple of gal pals rocking the mic.
No comments:
Post a Comment